Turn invoices, applications and shipment documents into checked, usable data. Start with one workflow, keep people in control and measure the difference.
One document type · Agreed validation rules · Human review
Estimate your workflow costs ↓
Preparing the sample…
Synthetic text demo, not OCR or an upload service. Edit an amount, then read again. Rules parse this sample locally in your browser. Click an extracted field to select its source. Please use fictional data only.
When critical work depends on copying information between documents, spreadsheets and business systems, growth creates more effort—not more capacity. MIRHEA finds the friction, redesigns the flow and automates the right steps.
We are building MIRHEA with a focus on India and opportunities across Europe. Our goal is measurable: reduce processing time, prevent avoidable errors and give every case a clear audit trail.
Three starting points for a focused pilot. Each workflow is tailored to your documents, rules and systems.
Extract invoice fields, check totals and required information, and compare against purchase-order data where available. Send mismatches to a reviewer.
Pilot output: reviewed invoice data ready for an agreed export or integration.
Read commercial invoices and packing lists, compare shipment details and flag missing documents against your checklist.
Pilot output: an exception queue and a draft request for missing information. Clearance decisions remain with your team.
Capture application fields, check completeness and organise supporting evidence so a person can review the case.
Pilot output: a structured intake record and review history. Approval and regulated decisions remain with your team.
Define a manageable first project before committing to a wider rollout. We agree the scope, delivery team, timeline, price and acceptance criteria before the build begins.
Scope a pilotField accuracy against reviewed answers · Handling time per document · Corrections and exception volume · Cost per processed document. Targets are agreed using your baseline.
Practical automation for teams where accuracy, speed and traceability matter.
Map the real workflow, quantify delays and errors, and identify the automation opportunities worth pursuing first.
Capture text, tables and selections from structured or variable documents, then validate them against business rules.
Move verified data into the systems your team already uses, with clear exception handling and audit-ready records.
Adjust volume, review time and costs to compare manual handling with an assisted workflow. Every assumption is yours to change.
Changing currency changes the unit only. It does not convert amounts; enter costs in your chosen currency.
*After the entered setup cost. Released staff time is a capacity estimate, not guaranteed cash savings or a reduction in headcount. This model excludes taxes, financing and ramp-up delays. Include all expected ongoing costs in your inputs.
Discuss these assumptions ↗What does the work cost today, and what could it cost after automation? These steps update when you change the inputs above.
| Route | Documents | Staff time each | Total staff time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automation works; a person reviews | |||
| Exception needs manual handling | |||
| Total |
Counts and hours are estimates rounded for display. Calculations use unrounded values. Exception time is total handling time, not additional time.
Processing, support and setup amounts are editable assumptions, not confirmed supplier prices or MIRHEA charges.
If salaries stay the same, released time lets your team handle other work. Cash savings require an actual reduction in costs, such as overtime or an avoided hire. Payback assumes that released time delivers equivalent economic value.
This estimates the customer’s business case. It does not determine MIRHEA’s price or profit.
We review the documents, handoffs, systems and edge cases with the people who perform the work.
We propose a clear future flow, expected impact and implementation scope before committing to a build.
We prove the workflow on a controlled sample, measure the result and refine exception handling.
Review the pilot results together. If you proceed, agree the production controls, rollout, documentation and support scope.
Start at the stage that fits your organisation. Each engagement has defined responsibilities, deliverables and a decision point.
Understand the process and confirm whether automation is worth pursuing.
Build a controlled version and evaluate it with the people who will use it.
Plan production delivery once the pilot meets the agreed requirements.
Start with a focused pilot, then choose a subscription matched to your document volume and team size. Larger plans include more processing capacity and more users.
One team, one document workflow.
3 users included
Start with a focused document process and a small review team.
Discuss this planRegular processing across your team.
10 users included
Bring more recurring document work and reviewers into the system.
Discuss this planMore volume. More collaboration.
25 users included
Support larger operations with a higher processing allowance.
Discuss this planA plan shaped around your operation.
Agreed user allowance
Discuss higher volumes, more users and specific delivery requirements.
Discuss this planScope your plan around document intake, extraction, agreed validation checks, exception handling, review tools and standard export. Your team performs the human review; any MIRHEA review service is scoped separately.
One credit covers one document of up to five pages. Each additional block of five pages uses another credit: a 12-page application uses three credits. Separate documents each use their own credits.
A document counts when extraction completes and results are available, including results flagged for review. Reviewing or correcting those results does not use another credit. Failed processing attempts and retries caused by MIRHEA are not charged.
Final pricing depends on document complexity, processing requirements and support. Setup, additional workflows and integrations are scoped separately.
We agree the monthly allowance, any additional users and extra-usage rates in your proposal. These are plan options to discuss; submitting an inquiry does not start a subscription.
Discovery starts with the tools you already use. We assess available APIs, structured imports or other suitable integration methods. An export can be the first step where a direct integration is not yet feasible.
Start the conversation with a process description or synthetic examples. Before receiving live documents, we agree the permitted data, processing location, access controls, retention and any necessary contractual arrangements. Local or private deployment is assessed against the chosen technology and project requirements.
The pilot defines the checks and the conditions that need human review. Missing fields, inconsistent values and uncertain extraction results can be flagged for correction. Automated checks support a reviewer; they do not guarantee that every error will be detected.
No. The public invoice case is an illustrative model, not a client result or a guarantee. Demonstrations use synthetic documents. We calculate your business case from your own volume, handling time, exception rate and costs.
We provide a scoped proposal after understanding the documents, rules, integration and data requirements. Delivery timing depends on the agreed scope, team availability and access to the required systems. Wider rollout and ongoing support are agreed separately.
Tell us which documents you handle, roughly how many arrive each month and where the information needs to go. We will review the fit and discuss a practical next step.
Please describe the process without including personal, confidential or customer data.
